|
@@ -364,9 +364,16 @@ organization of the course made it difficult for students to
|
|
|
understand the rationale for the compiler design. Ghuloum proposed the
|
|
understand the rationale for the compiler design. Ghuloum proposed the
|
|
|
incremental approach~\citep{Ghuloum:2006bh}.
|
|
incremental approach~\citep{Ghuloum:2006bh}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+We thank the many graduate students who served as teaching assistants
|
|
|
|
|
+for the compiler course at IU. In particular, we thank Andre
|
|
|
|
|
+Kuhlenschmidt for his work on the garbage collector, Michael Vollmer
|
|
|
|
|
+for his work on efficient tail calls, and Michael Vitousek for his
|
|
|
|
|
+help running the first offering of the incremental compiler course at
|
|
|
|
|
+IU.
|
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
We thank Bor-Yuh Chang, John Clements, Jay McCarthy, Joseph Near, Nate
|
|
We thank Bor-Yuh Chang, John Clements, Jay McCarthy, Joseph Near, Nate
|
|
|
Nystrom, and Michael Wollowski for teaching courses based on early
|
|
Nystrom, and Michael Wollowski for teaching courses based on early
|
|
|
-drafts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+drafts of this book.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We thank Ronald Garcia for being Jeremy's partner when they took the
|
|
We thank Ronald Garcia for being Jeremy's partner when they took the
|
|
|
compiler course in the early 2000's and especially for finding the bug
|
|
compiler course in the early 2000's and especially for finding the bug
|
Jeremy Siek