for explicate control, make sure input language is the monadic one

book.tex

@@ -3616,7 +3616,7 @@ output programs produce the same result as the input programs.
 \section{Explicate Control}
 \label{sec:explicate-control-Lvar}
 
-The \code{explicate\_control} pass compiles \LangVar{} programs into \LangCVar{}
+The \code{explicate\_control} pass compiles \LangVarANF{} programs into \LangCVar{}
 programs that make the order of execution explicit in their
 syntax. For now this amounts to flattening \key{let} constructs into a
 sequence of assignment statements. For example, consider the following
@@ -3702,11 +3702,11 @@ function should be applied to expressions in tail position, whereas the
 \code{explicate\_assign} should be applied to expressions that occur on
 the right-hand side of a \key{let}.
 %
-The \code{explicate\_tail} function takes an \Exp{} in \LangVar{} as
+The \code{explicate\_tail} function takes an \Exp{} in \LangVarANF{} as
 input and produces a \Tail{} in \LangCVar{} (see
 figure~\ref{fig:c0-syntax}).
 %
-The \code{explicate\_assign} function takes an \Exp{} in \LangVar{},
+The \code{explicate\_assign} function takes an \Exp{} in \LangVarANF{},
 the variable to which it is to be assigned, and a \Tail{} in
 \LangCVar{} for the code that comes after the assignment.  The
 \code{explicate\_assign} function returns a $\Tail$ in \LangCVar{}.
@@ -3725,7 +3725,7 @@ generated code.
 \begin{exercise}\normalfont\normalsize
 %
 Implement the \code{explicate\_control} function in
-\code{compiler.rkt}.  Create three new \LangInt{} programs that
+\code{compiler.rkt}.  Create three new \LangVar{} programs that
 exercise the code in \code{explicate\_control}.
 %
 In the \code{run-tests.rkt} script, add the following entry to the
@@ -9041,10 +9041,10 @@ list of \code{passes} and then run the script to test your compiler.
   make the order of evaluation explicit in the syntax of the program.
   With the addition of \key{if}, this becomes more interesting.}
 %
-The \code{explicate\_control} pass translates from \LangIf{} to \LangCIf{}.
+The \code{explicate\_control} pass translates from \LangIfANF{} to \LangCIf{}.
 %
 The main challenge to overcome is that the condition of an \key{if}
-can be an arbitrary expression in \LangIf{}, whereas in \LangCIf{} the
+can be an arbitrary expression in \LangIfANF{}, whereas in \LangCIf{} the
 condition must be a comparison.
 
 As a motivating example, consider the following program that has an
@@ -9113,7 +9113,7 @@ For example, we want to generate the following code for the inner
 \end{minipage}
 \end{center}
 One way to achieve this goal is to reorganize the code at the level of
-\LangIf{}, pushing the outer \key{if} inside the inner one, yielding
+\LangIf{} or \LangIfANF{}, pushing the outer \key{if} inside the inner one, yielding
 the following code:
 \begin{center}
 \begin{minipage}{0.96\textwidth}
@@ -9263,7 +9263,7 @@ block_3:
 \end{tabular} 
 \fi}
 \end{tcolorbox}
-\caption{Translation from \LangIf{} to \LangCIf{}
+\caption{Translation from \LangIfANF{} to \LangCIf{}
   via the \code{explicate\_control}.}
 \label{fig:explicate-control-s1-38}
 \end{figure}
@@ -9272,15 +9272,15 @@ block_3:
 {\if\edition\racketEd        
 %
 Recall that in section~\ref{sec:explicate-control-Lvar} we implement
-\code{explicate\_control} for \LangVar{} using two recursive
+\code{explicate\_control} for \LangVarANF{} using two recursive
 functions, \code{explicate\_tail} and \code{explicate\_assign}.  The
 former function translates expressions in tail position, whereas the
 latter function translates expressions on the right-hand side of a
-\key{let}. With the addition of \key{if} expression to \LangIf{} we
+\key{let}. With the addition of \key{if} expression to \LangIfANF{} we
 have a new kind of position to deal with: the predicate position of
 the \key{if}. We need another function, \code{explicate\_pred}, that
 decides how to compile an \key{if} by analyzing its condition.  So,
-\code{explicate\_pred} takes an \LangIf{} expression and two
+\code{explicate\_pred} takes an \LangIfANF{} expression and two
 \LangCIf{} tails for the \emph{then} branch and \emph{else} branch
 and outputs a tail.  In the following paragraphs we discuss specific
 cases in the \code{explicate\_tail}, \code{explicate\_assign}, and
@@ -11920,10 +11920,10 @@ $\Rightarrow$
 {\if\edition\racketEd
 
 Recall that in the \code{explicate\_control} pass we define one helper
-function for each kind of position in the program.  For the \LangVar{}
+function for each kind of position in the program.  For the \LangVarANF{}
 language of integers and variables, we needed assignment and tail
-positions. The \code{if} expressions of \LangIf{} introduced predicate
-positions. For \LangLoop{}, the \code{begin} expression introduces yet
+positions. The \code{if} expressions of \LangIfANF{} introduced predicate
+positions. For \LangLoopANF{}, the \code{begin} expression introduces yet
 another kind of position: effect position. Except for the last
 subexpression, the subexpressions inside a \code{begin} are evaluated
 only for their effect. Their result values are discarded. We can
@@ -16036,7 +16036,7 @@ in tail position \code{Apply} becomes \code{TailCall}.}
 We recommend defining a new auxiliary function for processing function
 definitions.  This code is similar to the case for \code{Program} in
 \LangVec{}.  The top-level \code{explicate\_control} function that
-handles the \code{ProgramDefs} form of \LangFun{} can apply this
+handles the \code{ProgramDefs} form of \LangFunANF{} can apply this
 new function to all function definitions.
 
 {\if\edition\pythonEd\pythonColor